Code tester
Tests that keep up with the code
Synced to the repository. When a method changes, its tests are regenerated — in your conventions, with your fixtures. Paths that already have coverage are skipped, and a test that has been flaky before arrives with the fix that worked last time.
The problem
Coverage decays quietly
Tests are written once, at the moment a feature ships, by whoever had the context. Then the code moves. The test still passes because it's asserting something that no longer matters, and the path that actually broke has no coverage at all.
Generated tests usually make this worse. They don't know your fixture setup, they invent mock patterns you don't use, and they duplicate coverage that already exists — so reviewers stop reading them and start rubber-stamping.
What it does
Generation grounded in your test suite
Generating a test is the easy half. The value is in knowing what already exists, so you get the cases you're missing rather than more of the ones you have.
Repository sync
Tracks the repo. When a method changes, the tests covering it are flagged and regenerated rather than left to drift.
Your conventions
Retrieves your existing tests as context, so generated cases match your framework, fixture style, naming, and assertion patterns.
Coverage awareness
Knows which paths already have tests. Generates for the gaps instead of adding a fourth test for the happy path.
Failure memory
Remembers which tests have been flaky and what fixed them last time, so recurring failures come with their own history attached.
FAQ
Which frameworks are supported?
Does it open pull requests?
Will it duplicate existing coverage?
It retrieves the current test suite before generating, so existing coverage is context rather than something it rediscovers.